how large?

The hills behind Castle Hill in Budapest are large.

In the previous post, I mentioned having large stretches of time where my leukemia is not relevant to the conversation. That got me wondering: exactly how large are these stretches of time? How long do I go between mentions of my leukemia in conversation on a day to day basis and how long do I go between telling someone new about my leukemia?

For the first question, replaying my day in my (somewhat foggy, post-chemo) brain, I come up with the following times leukemia came up implicitly or explicitly during the workday:
1. I brought my old port into the office and showed it to my nurse (long story involving cleaning out the place it used to be kept)
2. I was sitting in the doctor's dictation room at the hospital (it is a very tiny room where we doctors shoe horn in to do our charting) and one of the other doctors is a few months older than me. We talked about how we are both turning fifty next year and I mentioned how pleased I am to be another year older. Further conversation ensued about mortality and my experiences.
3. One of the nurses who knew me pre-leukemia told me how much she likes my curls.
4. I explained ports and PICCs to a patient who may need long term IV access. Everyone in the room but the patient and their family knew that I knew exactly what I was talking about
5. A patient mentioned that her hair was darker now since having chemo and wondered if it usually comes in darker. "Yes, it does," I answered, "and curlier." She did not know that I and my nurse both knew the answer to this question was personal.

There were certainly many other times when I thought about it or touched on the "I had leukemia" factoid during the day and I bet there were other times someone made reference to it during the day that I just don't remember because I cannot recall everything that goes through my head in a day (thank heavens). As I go through my day tomorrow, I think I will try to be aware of when I think of the leukemia or when someone says something that alludes to it and see what I get. Anybody want to guess?

another milestone

Last week, Terry and I were getting thai take out and the person in line behind me looked familiar. Because I'm a doofus (just ask my kids), I introduced myself and said "I know you; can't recall your name; I bet you're an Exeter doc." In fact, he was and we reminisced about Exeter when I was there, various events that had transpired, how things were different and the whole hep C story. We told him about our new house (which we bought from another former Exeter doc) and talked about the Manchester hospital scene. After we said our goodbyes, I realized that we had not discussed AML at all. It was a milestone: catching someone up to date on my recent life that did not include "I don't know if you heard; I had leukemia last year." Kind of a nice milestone to have, as though there is a possibility of having a life where leukemia is just a footnote.

The day described above is coming, just like the snow pictured here.

I am hopeful for more days where my leukemia is not relevant to the conversation and thankful that I have large stretches of time where it is not.

A uncomposed photo and a tiny announcement

Fireworks two years ago.

A really happy thing is that it seems to be becoming less of a big deal for me when I get labs. Two days ago I had another set and while my marrow is not the most robust marrow you've ever met, it does not seem to have any signs of leukemia. As one of my oncology pals said, "Don't underestimate how beat up your marrow is from the chemo." 

 

 

It makes a difference. Or not.

I had an interesting experience recently that was only marginally linked to leukemia, but it's my blog so I can put whatever I want up.

Recently, it seemed that a patient had a turning point after I said to the family that if loving someone alot could keep them here, their loved one would not die. They said, "I don't want Sidney to die" and I said, "If loving someone a lot could keep them here, s/he would not die." I'm not quite sure why that was the response I made out of the hundreds of potential responses to their statement. It seemed to help (maybe not; maybe I'm just being self congratulatory) and I was glad I said it.

It made me think of the last time I spoke a similar thought--the first day of my chemo. Eva and John had come to hang out with me and distract me while what I thought was my strongest defense mechanism (denial) was being destroyed. How can you deny that you have cancer when some one in a space suit is advancing on you with a vial of bright red liquid? I was worried about what might happen/how I might feel and react when she showed up with it so I asked my kind friend and her husband to distract me. I ended up telling John and Eva my story and it turned out to be an ideal strategy for me. I remember opening the story by telling them that because my mother died when I was seven, I had always known that it didn't matter how much you loved someone or how much you needed them, they could still die. What I said to my patient's family is a kinder version of that. It may be that that was the unspoken thought they were having in "I don't want Sidney to die" and I recognized it and was able to respond to it. At any rate, I felt lucky to have been there.

People talk about doctors using their life experience as a lens through which we view the experiences of patients. I think this is an example of that.

I am grateful that my loved ones are around me and hopeful for a long continuation of that.